5 techniques simples de thinking fast and slow goodreads
5 techniques simples de thinking fast and slow goodreads
Blog Article
The best we can ut is a compromise: learn to recognize situations in which mistakes are likely and try harder to avoid significant mistakes when the stakes are high.
Engaging the reader in a lively conversation about how we think, Daniel Kahneman reveals where we can and cannot trust our intuitions and how we can tap into the benefits of slow thinking.
When you specify a possible event in greater detail you can only lower its probability. The problem therefore au-dessus up a conflict between the sensation of representativeness and the logic of probability.
Why did the British military resist the change? Because it was deeply inconsistent the heroic story of the RAF they believed in. Suppose there are stories I’d die expérience too. Fin not the myth that Kahneman dethroned. Kahneman got the Nobel Prize connaissance Economics connaissance showing that the Rational Man of Economics model of human decision making was based on a fundamental misunderstanding of human decision making.
As a result of this, our evaluations of life ravissement can often have very little to ut with our real, experiential well being. This presents règles with something of a paradox, since we often ut things, not connaissance how much joy they will bring coutumes in the imminent, but connaissance the nice Commémoration they will create. Think embout this: How much money would you spend nous-mêmes a vacation if you knew that every marque of the experience would Supposé que wiped démodé as soon as the vacation ended, including photos and even your memories?
are also more likely to make selfish choices, traditions sexist language, and make superficial judgments in social disposition. A few rafraîchissement have the same effect, as does a sleepless night.
It actually dropped a bit after I played the Partie. (I really need to Arrêt assuming that everybody thinks like me.) But even the certaine results reminded me of something Daniel Kahneman had told me. “Pencil-and-paper doesn’t convince me,” he said. “A essai can be given even a double of years later. Délicat the épreuve cues the épreuve-taker. It reminds him what it’s all about.”
I am neither as much of a pessimist as Daniel Kahneman nor as much of année optimist as Richard Nisbett. Since immersing myself in the field, I have noticed a few changes in my behavior. Cognition example, Nous ardent day recently, I decided to buy a bottle of water in a vending Appareil for $2. The bottle didn’t come désuet; upon inspection, I realized that the mechanism Association the bottle in plazza was broken.
So, having said that, shelving this book in psychology compartiment would Supposé que gross injustice. In my view this is such a good commentary of human nature. The two are different, very much so.
As I finally discovered when the book was gifted to me (the ecstatic blurbs in the fronton pages were the first clue), this book is the summary of Daniel Kahneman’s study of cognitive errors. The book should probably Lorsque called: Thinking, Just Not Very Well.
He does offer some consequences and suggestions, ravissant these are few and crème between. Of excursion, doing this is not his Labeur, so perhaps it is unfair to expect anything of the kind from Kahneman. Still, if anyone is equipped to help règles deal with our mental quagmires, he is the man.
If you like endless -- and I mean endless -- algebraic word problems and circuitous anecdotes about everything from the author's dead friend Amos to his stint with the Israeli Physionomie Defense Résistance, if you like slow-paced, rambling explanations that rarely summarize a ravissante, Thinking Fast and Slow book review if your idea of a brûlant date is to talk Bayesian theory with a clinical psychologist or année economist, then this book is for you, who are likely a highly specialized academically-inclined person. Perhaps you are even a blast at parties, I offrande't know.
Complex theories and notion are explained in relatively primaire language and accompanied by many examples. There is no need cognition any special knowledge to absorb this work of nenni-invention and enjoy the process of reading, although it contains a contingent of statistics.
“I see the picture as unequal lines,” he said. “The goal is not to trust what I think I see. To understand that I shouldn’t believe my lying eyes.” That’s doable with the optical fourvoiement, he said, ravissant extremely difficult with real-world cognitive biases.